What is the Singularity?

A “Singularity” in physics is, roughly speaking, a point. Singularities exist in the universe as black holes, infinitely dense points of mass which have a gravitational field so strong that not even light can escape it. The universe is thought by many to have been a singularity prior to exploding in the big bang.

That ring around that black hole, where light meets darkness, that is what we are talking about when we apply the notion of a physical singularity to technological progress. It is a point when the exponential progress of something (such as gravity or technology) becomes so great that we cannot possibly know the properties of what lies beyond. it is the point on a graph of an exponential curve when the line becomes practically vertical.

There is of course no one point at which an exponential curve looks vertical, but there are certainly milestones which we can identify with this vertical takeoff. For the purposes of the technological singularity, perhaps the most important milestone is the development by humans of a superhuman intelligence, a computer which surpasses us in our processing power. The implications of this are staggering. The natural unknowability of this intelligence causes intense fear in some people and intense excitement in others. While opinions are divided somewhat on the existential risk artificial intelligence poses, the consensus is that it will be significant.

Very soon our technology will design our technology. I would say “make” instead of “design,” but we’ve always used technology to make more technology. Computers will be caught in a positive reinforcing loop of self improvement, getting better at designing computers smarter the smarter it designs computers, just as our technologies have been caught in a self reinforcing loop as we are capable of creating more with them.

In an attempt to predict the unpredictable, people have drawn many conclusions and conjectures about the nature of the post-singularity era. I feel as though I can roughly divide these into a pros and cons list, but I hope to show you eventually how meaningless such a list is for this event:


  • human “immortality”
  • unprecedented standard of living for all humans
  • solutions to all of our energy problems (post-scarcity)
  • unprecedented worldwide cooperation and cohesion
  • everything that humankind has ever wanted


  • extinction of the human species
  • loss of individuality, identity, free will, humanness
  • mountains of ethical problems
  • everything that humankind has ever feared

My task and undertaking in this blog is to sort these predictions out, expound upon them, and offer my own vision of what the singularity means for life, the universe, and everything.



About Prometheus

I write about the coming technological singularity and its implications for our sense of identity, individuality, meaning, and existence. I argue that the most significant aspect of the singularity is the convergence of our consciousnesses into one superconsciousness, and that we should be very happy about this.

Posted on April 26, 2011, in Technological Singularity and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink. 3 Comments.

  1. Wow…you have carved out one hell of an obejctive 😀

    Look forward to reading through this universe of thought! Being kind of a classical bigot this will be good for me to explore with an open mind.

  2. It seems as though we think of a lot of similar things. One of my recent blog posts was called ‘The Coming Singularity,’ and I expound upon the idea of a singularity though more in an aspect of reality/life/consciousness as opposed to technology, but nonetheless the two are certainly related.

  3. Another thought… the difference in perspective here might just be an issue of the semantics of localized vs. distributed intelligence, but in that case wouldn’t a technological singularity be precluded because it’s a localized phenomenon? If the internet, and the individual people using it, are all destined for a collectivity of operation, why should we think that this collectivity would paradoxically be contained under any sort of singular and localized structure which itself is not subject to distribution of some sort? Seems like another version of that ‘Universal Set’ paradox.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: